ShareDoc
Features Resources Pricing Log in

Pitch Alternative

You're Overpaying to Track the Wrong Documents

Most of your important documents aren't decks. Yet Pitch charges $23+ per seat monthly[3] to track presentations only. ShareDoc tracks any PDF — contracts, proposals, reports — completely free.

Start tracking free — no credit card

$0/mo

ShareDoc vs Pitch's $276+/year

Any PDF

vs presentations only

30 seconds

No deck editor learning curve

Feature-by-feature comparison

Feature ShareDoc Pitch
Track any PDF Presentations only
Free plan tracking Full analytics Limited
Pricing (single user) $0/mo $15-30/mo
Team of 5 pricing $0-29/mo total $115/mo minimum
Page-by-page tracking
Lead capture forms
Real-time alerts
Password protection
Create presentations
AI credits included N/A 3,000-9,000/year

3 reasons teams abandon Pitch for ShareDoc

1. They're tracking the wrong documents

Your sales team's most important documents aren't pitch decks — they're contracts, proposals, and case studies. G2 reviewers complain[11] that Pitch only tracks presentations, forcing teams to use multiple tools. ShareDoc tracks any PDF: contracts know who's reviewing terms, proposals show engagement by section, whitepapers capture qualified leads. One tool, any document.

2. Per-seat pricing kills adoption

Pitch's Team plan starts at $23/seat/month. A 10-person sales team pays $2,760 annually just to track who viewed their decks. ShareDoc is free for all features — everyone on your team can track documents without budget approval. When tracking costs nothing, people actually use it.

3. They need tracking, not another editor

Teams already have presentation tools — PowerPoint, Google Slides, Keynote. They don't need another deck editor with a learning curve and "limited fonts and animations"[11] as users report. They need to know who's reading their existing PDFs. ShareDoc works with any PDF from any tool — upload and share in 30 seconds.

When Pitch is the better choice

If your primary need is creating beautiful presentations collaboratively, Pitch excels. Their real-time collaboration, professional templates, and AI-powered deck creation tools are genuinely impressive. Teams who live in presentation mode — agencies pitching concepts, consultants delivering strategies — benefit from Pitch's all-in-one approach.

But most business documents aren't presentations. If you need to track contracts, proposals, reports, case studies, or any other PDF — and know exactly who's reading them — ShareDoc does that for free while Pitch can't do it at all.

How to switch in 30 seconds

1.

Go to sharedoc.co

2.

Upload your PDF — no account needed

3.

Get your tracked link and share it

4.

See who's reading in real-time — names, companies, page-by-page activity

No deck editor to learn. No seats to buy. Just instant tracking for any PDF you already have.

Stop paying $23/seat to track the wrong documents

Track any PDF free. No credit card. No per-seat pricing.

Start tracking free

Sources

  1. [3] pitch.com — Pitch Pricing Plans 2026
  2. [11] g2.com — Pitch User Reviews and Ratings

Related

Pitch vs ShareDoc for Account Executives | ShareDoc

Account executives need quick PDF tracking, not presentation software. ShareDoc gives you instant tracking and lead capture for sales documents in 30 seconds.

Pitch vs ShareDoc for Sales Teams | ShareDoc

Sales teams don't need expensive presentation software to track PDFs. ShareDoc gives you instant tracking and lead capture in 30 seconds. Free vs $25/seat.

Pitch vs ShareDoc for RevOps Teams | ShareDoc

Compare Pitch vs ShareDoc for RevOps teams. ShareDoc offers instant PDF tracking and lead capture, while Pitch focuses on presentations. Free vs $15+/month.

Pitch vs ShareDoc for SDRs | ShareDoc

Compare Pitch and ShareDoc for SDR teams. ShareDoc offers instant PDF tracking and lead capture for $0, while Pitch starts at $15/mo for presentations.

Track PDFs on LinkedIn Messages | ShareDoc

See who opens your PDFs sent via LinkedIn. Get read notifications and page analytics for LinkedIn outreach. Free document tracking.